<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community:</title>
    <link>https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/126</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-26T09:40:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Scapular pain in cervical radiculopathy: A scoping review</title>
      <link>https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/484</link>
      <description>Title: Scapular pain in cervical radiculopathy: A scoping review
Authors: Carmichael, Joel; Weber II, Kenneth A.; Rubinstein, Sidney; Svoboda, Ellie; Bade, Michael
Abstract: Background: Controversy persists regarding the relationship between scapular pain and cervical radiculopathy,&#xD;
with no consensus on cervical radiculopathy’s definition, radicular pain distribution, or the diagnostic value of&#xD;
scapular pain. This review aims to map the literature describing scapular pain distribution in cervical radiculopathy in clinical practice and research.&#xD;
Methods: This scoping review followed JBI methodology, guided by the PRISMA-ScR extension. Studies reporting on cervical radiculopathies with described radicular pain distribution were included. Exclusions applied to&#xD;
radicular pain from peripheral neuropathy, fracture, cancer, rheumatologic, or vascular disorders, and inadequately described scapular pain. Information sources included Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web&#xD;
of Science, and CINAHL. JBI methodology was followed, guided by the PRISMA-ScR extension. Pain distributions&#xD;
were mapped by region, cervical nerve root level, and diagnostic confirmation methods.&#xD;
Results: The review included 86 studies (1957–2022). Among the 81 studies describing pain distribution, neck&#xD;
(88%), arm (85%), and scapula (72%) were most frequently reported. Of 60 studies documenting pain by nerve&#xD;
root level, C6 (82%), C7 (77%), and C8 (63%) were most common, with C7 showing the highest percentage of&#xD;
scapular pain descriptions. Evidence indicates scapular pain may precede arm pain by several weeks in cervical&#xD;
radiculopathy.&#xD;
Conclusions: Evidence supports scapular pain as a symptom of cervical radiculopathy, potentially preceding arm&#xD;
pain by weeks. Future studies should document symptoms at onset, define radicular pain distributions, include&#xD;
participants with scapular pain, and assess the diagnostic utility of scapular pain in cervical radiculopathy</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/484</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-05-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is it all About the Quads? Implications of the Calf Musculature Post-ACL Injury in Return to Sport Rehab</title>
      <link>https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/467</link>
      <description>Title: Is it all About the Quads? Implications of the Calf Musculature Post-ACL Injury in Return to Sport Rehab
Authors: Christman, Devin; Jayaseelan, Dhinu J.
Abstract: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a significant injury for athletes participating&#xD;
in cutting and pivoting sports requiring lengthy rehabilitation. Athletes undergoing&#xD;
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) continue to be limited in the ability to&#xD;
return to their sport and to their prior level of performance despite undergoing&#xD;
postoperative rehabilitation. For those that do return to sport, re-injury rates remain&#xD;
high (~20%). Current rehabilitation guidelines address knee joint impairments and&#xD;
neurocognitive/sensorimotor factors, but do not address how the triceps surae muscles&#xD;
are also affected following ACL injury. This clinical commentary aims to examine the&#xD;
potential mechanisms surrounding the contributions of the gastrocnemius and soleus&#xD;
musculature on tibial kinematics, the effects ACL injury has on the calf musculature, and&#xD;
the potential clinical implications for prevention of subsequent injuries in the post ACLR&#xD;
rehabilitation framework. Sex differences and rehab considerations across the pre- and&#xD;
post-surgical ACLR timeline are also addressed.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/467</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pneumothorax After Dry Needling of Intrascapular Muscles Using a Rib Bracketing Technique Insights from the Clinician, Patient, and Clinical Expert</title>
      <link>https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/466</link>
      <description>Title: Pneumothorax After Dry Needling of Intrascapular Muscles Using a Rib Bracketing Technique Insights from the Clinician, Patient, and Clinical Expert
Authors: Warneke [et. al.], Konstantin
Abstract: Background: Stretching has wide appeal, but there seems to exist some mismatch between its&#xD;
purported applications and what the evidence shows. There is compelling evidence for some&#xD;
stretching applications, but for others, the evidence seems heterogeneous or unsupportive. The&#xD;
discrepancies even affect some systematic reviews, possibly due to heterogeneous eligibility criteria&#xD;
and search strategies. This consensus paper seeks to unify the divergent findings on stretching and its&#xD;
implications for both athletic performance and clinical practices by delivering evidence-based&#xD;
recommendations.&#xD;
Methods: A panel of 20 experts with a blend of practical experience and scholarly knowledge was&#xD;
assembled. The panel meticulously reviewed existing systematic reviews, defined key terminologies&#xD;
(e.g., consensus definitions for different stretching modes), and crafted guidelines using a Delphi&#xD;
consensus approach (minimum required agreement: 80%). The analysis focused on 8 topics, including&#xD;
stretching’s acute and chronic (long-term) effects on range of motion, strength performance, muscle&#xD;
hypertrophy, stiffness, injury prevention, muscle recovery, posture correction, and cardiovascular&#xD;
health.&#xD;
Results: There was consensus that chronic and acute stretching (a) improves range of motion&#xD;
(although alternatives exist) and (b) reduces muscle stiffness (which may not always be desirable); the&#xD;
panel also agreed that chronic stretching (c) may promote vascular health, but more research is&#xD;
warranted. In contrast, consensus was found that stretch training does not (a) contribute substantively&#xD;
to muscle growth, (b) serve as an all-encompassing injury prevention strategy, (c) improve posture, or&#xD;
(d) acutely enhance post-exercise recovery. Conclusion: These recommendations provide guidance for athletes and practitioners, highlighting&#xD;
research gaps that should be addressed to more comprehensively understand the full scope of&#xD;
stretching effects.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/466</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-04-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pneumothorax After Dry Needling of Intrascapular Muscles Using a Rib Bracketing Technique: Insights from the Clinician, Patient, and Clinical Expert</title>
      <link>https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/465</link>
      <description>Title: Pneumothorax After Dry Needling of Intrascapular Muscles Using a Rib Bracketing Technique: Insights from the Clinician, Patient, and Clinical Expert
Authors: Mintken, Paul E; Denman, Blair; Dommerholt, Jan
Abstract: Importance&#xD;
This case report emphasizes the importance of&#xD;
recognizing and preventing adverse events,&#xD;
specifically pneumothorax related to dry needling&#xD;
(DN), particularly when using rib bracketing&#xD;
techniques in the intrascapular region. It highlights&#xD;
the need for greater clinician awareness to enhance&#xD;
patient safety and minimize the risk of&#xD;
complications during DN interventions.&#xD;
Objective&#xD;
The objective of this case report was to describe the&#xD;
clinical presentation, progression, and outcome of a&#xD;
patient who developed a pneumothorax following&#xD;
DN, and to propose alternative methods for safer&#xD;
needling in the intrascapular musculature.&#xD;
Design:This case report presents a detailed account of a&#xD;
single patient’s clinical experience—including the&#xD;
adverse event, its management, and outcome—&#xD;
supplemented by expert commentary from a&#xD;
clinician specializing in dry needling.&#xD;
Setting&#xD;
The setting of this case report was an outpatient&#xD;
physical therapy clinic.&#xD;
Participants&#xD;
A 24-year-old woman undergoing physical therapy&#xD;
for chronic neck and shoulder pain.&#xD;
Intervention(s) or Exposure(s)&#xD;
The physical therapist administered DN to the left&#xD;
intrascapular muscles using a rib bracketing&#xD;
technique to treat trigger points.&#xD;
Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)&#xD;
The primary outcome was the development of a&#xD;
pneumothorax, identified through clinical&#xD;
symptoms and confirmed by radiographic imaging.&#xD;
Outcomes included hospitalization, symptom&#xD;
resolution, and return to physical activity.&#xD;
Results&#xD;
The patient experienced an unusually sharp pain&#xD;
during needle insertion. Over the following 2 days,&#xD;
she developed dyspnea, thoracic pain, dry cough,&#xD;
and chest discomfort. A radiograph confirmed a&#xD;
moderate left-sided pneumothorax, which was&#xD;
treated with chest tube reinflation and 1 night of&#xD;
hospitalization. Post-discharge, the patient had&#xD;
residual symptoms for 2 weeks but achieved&#xD;
complete recovery by 1 month, returning to activities like hiking and skiing.&#xD;
Conclusions&#xD;
DN can result in serious complications such as&#xD;
pneumothorax. Early recognition and immediate&#xD;
treatment can lead to full recovery. This case raises&#xD;
concerns about the safety of the rib bracketing&#xD;
technique for DN in the thoracic intrascapular&#xD;
region.&#xD;
Relevance&#xD;
Physical therapists should exercise caution when&#xD;
performing DN, especially in high-risk anatomical&#xD;
areas. Safer techniques should be considered, and&#xD;
vigilance is crucial to detect and manage adverse&#xD;
events promptly. Enhancing practitioner awareness&#xD;
can significantly improve patient outcomes and&#xD;
safety during rehabilitation interventions.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://absmari.dspaces.org/jspui/handle/123456789/465</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

